Skip to content

Transportation Department Finalizes Fuel Economy Rollback, Setting 34.9 MPG Fleet Target for 2031

TAT
Traders Agency TeamThe Traders Agency editorial team delivers daily market anal...
September 28, 2026|5 min read

Follow Traders Agency on Google. Add us as a preferred source so our market analysis shows up more in your Search and AI results.

Add to Preferred Sources

The Trump administration finalized a significant loosening of federal fuel economy requirements on Monday, with the Transportation Department setting a fleetwide average of 34.9 miles per gallon by 2031, down sharply from the 50.4 mpg standard finalized under President Joe Biden, according to CNBC. The move formalizes an approach that had been previewed in a December proposal and locks in a materially lower efficiency trajectory for new cars and light trucks sold in the United States through the early 2030s.

What the Final Rule Changes

Under the Biden-era rules, required fuel efficiency for cars was set to climb 8% annually for model years 2024 and 2025, 10% in 2026, and 2% annually from 2027 through 2031, CNBC reported. The December proposal that laid the groundwork for Monday's final rule instead called for resetting standards beginning with model year 2022, then raising them just 0.5% annually through 2026 and 0.25% annually from 2028 through 2031, with a transitional standard in 2027, according to Stocktwits. The net effect, as finalized, is a fleetwide target of 34.9 mpg by 2031 versus the 50.4 mpg Biden had required, a gap of roughly 15.5 mpg by our calculation (50.4 minus 34.9).

Cost Savings Versus Fuel and Emissions Tradeoffs

The Transportation Department's own analysis, as reported by CNBC, acknowledges that the new standards will cut the cost of new vehicles but increase fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions for decades. NHTSA had estimated that its proposal would lower the average upfront price of a new vehicle by about $930, according to Stocktwits, while projecting 100 billion additional gallons of fuel consumed through 2050 and $185 billion more in fuel spending. Read together, those reported agency figures frame the rule as a trade of near-term purchase savings for higher long-run fuel costs and emissions — an interpretation consistent with Seeking Alpha's characterization of the standards as favoring lower-cost vehicles over stricter environmental targets.

Trump and Industry React

President Trump announced his approval of the looser standards on Saturday, calling it a "BIG DAY FOR AMERICAN AUTO WORKERS AND CAR BUYERS" in a Truth Social post and saying the new rules would end what he described as the Biden administration's "EV Mandate," per Stocktwits. He said automakers had been calling him wanting to build in the U.S., naming General Motors, Ford and Stellantis, and pointed to Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and South Carolina as states poised to benefit. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said after the Saturday announcement that further details would follow on Monday, Stocktwits reported.

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the trade group representing GM, Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Ford and other major automakers, said the government "made the right call to better align fuel economy standards with the law and current market conditions," arguing the Biden rules "effectively required a switchover to electric vehicles that was out of step with market realities and customer demand," according to CNBC.

Environmental Groups Signal Opposition

The Sierra Club said it will fight the rollback. "Americans need relief from high costs, but instead Trump is giving automakers a free pass on pollution and handing families the bill — at the pump and with their health," the group said, per CNBC. The group's remarks as reported did not describe a specific legal strategy.

Market Reaction and Automaker Investment Plans

Shares of Stellantis rose 1% overnight late Sunday following Trump's announcement, while GM gained 0.2% and Ford edged up 0.1%, Stocktwits reported. Those moves came against a backdrop of already-announced domestic production commitments: Stellantis has outlined a $13 billion U.S. investment over four years covering five new vehicles and more than 5,000 jobs, GM has announced roughly $4 billion over two years to expand U.S. gasoline and EV production, and Ford said it will boost U.S. Lincoln production starting in 2030 while phasing out Lincoln imports from China, according to Stocktwits.

Even so, Cox Automotive forecasts the Detroit three will hold just over 36% of the U.S. market at the end of the third quarter, their lowest share on record, as consumers shift toward hybrids and passenger cars where Asian automakers hold an edge, per Stocktwits. Cox projects year-to-date sales gains of 1.1% for Toyota and 5.6% for Honda, and expects Hyundai Motor Group to outsell Ford in the third quarter; the firm raised its full-year U.S. new-vehicle sales forecast to 16.1 million from 15.8 million, Stocktwits reported. CNBC reported that U.S. drivers have faced sharply higher fuel prices since the start of the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran at the end of February, while Stocktwits noted that higher fuel prices have made automakers' product mix more consequential.

U.S. EV makers' shares are broadly lower this year: Tesla is down 17%, Rivian 22% and Lucid about 57%, while Stellantis has lost 58% of its value and Toyota has fallen 11%, according to Stocktwits. Taken together, these year-to-date declines suggest investors have already been pricing in a policy environment less favorable to EV-focused mandates, though the moves predate and are broader than Monday's specific rule finalization, and should not be read as a direct market verdict on the CAFE rollback itself.

Bottom Line

The Transportation Department has finalized a fuel economy standard well below the Biden administration's target, trading projected near-term vehicle cost savings for higher fuel use and emissions over coming decades, by the agency's own estimates. Automakers' trade group has welcomed the change while the Sierra Club has vowed to fight it, and the practical effect on production plans, EV rollout timelines and legal challenges will likely play out over the coming weeks as more details emerge.

DISCLAIMER: Traders Agency does not offer financial advice. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Traders Agency is not responsible for any financial losses or consequences resulting from the use of the information provided. Trading carries inherent risks and may not be suitable for all individuals. You are advised to conduct your own research and seek personalized advice before making any investment decisions, recognizing the potential risks and rewards involved.

See more from Traders Agency on Google

Make us a preferred source and our market analysis will appear more prominently in your Google Search, Top Stories, and AI results.

Add to Preferred Sources
Traders Agency

Written by

Traders Agency TeamEditorial Team

The Traders Agency editorial team delivers daily market analysis, stock research, and trading education. Our team of analysts covers stocks, options, crypto, commodities, and macroeconomics to help traders make informed decisions.

Join the Edge

Stop watching.
Start winning.

50,000+ traders get our daily brief before the market opens.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Traders AgencyWhat Customers Say
4.8
1,544